AI adoption in legal is accelerating. But the firms that deploy thoughtfully — rather than reactively — are the ones that avoid costly reversals, regulatory scrutiny, and staff resistance. This checklist was developed by the Valren team over two years of implementation work with law firms, FCA-regulated fintechs, and in-house legal departments.

It is not exhaustive. It is a filter. If you cannot confidently answer these 12 questions, you are not ready to deploy — and that is useful information to have before you sign a contract.

The 12 Questions

What a Credible Answer Looks Like

The point of this checklist is not to produce 12 polished answers for a board presentation. It is to identify the questions where your answer is weak or uncertain — and treat those as blockers rather than risks to manage later.

In our experience, firms that rush past questions 3, 5, and 10 are the ones that face the most significant issues post-deployment. These are the questions that feel administrative but carry the highest consequence when they go wrong.

A credible answer is specific. "We will review AI output" is not a credible answer to question 6. "All AI-drafted clauses are reviewed by a qualified solicitor before client delivery, and this step is logged in our matter management system" is a credible answer.

Using This in Practice

We recommend running this checklist as a structured exercise with your senior partners or general counsel, your IT lead, and your compliance officer — not as a solo exercise by whichever partner is championing the AI initiative.

The questions where there is disagreement or uncertainty in the room are the questions that need answering before you move forward. Document the discussion. It forms the basis of your AI governance framework.

If you would like to work through this checklist with the Valren team — and map your answers against your planned deployment — we offer a one-hour AI readiness session as part of our onboarding process.